restore material from callbacks manual chapter that was truncated during conversion to Sphinx

This commit is contained in:
Craig Dowell
2012-11-12 11:46:24 -08:00
parent 5e6ad05194
commit 86d985d22d

View File

@@ -253,3 +253,333 @@ Here is an example of the usage::
SpecificFunctor<A, int> sf(&a, &A::Hello);
sf(5);
}
.. note:: The previous code is not real ns-3 code. It is simplistic example
code used only to illustrate the concepts involved and to help you understand
the system more. Do not expect to find this code anywhere in the ns-3 tree.
Notice that there are two variables defined in the class above. The m_p
variable is the object pointer and m_pmi is the variable containing the
address of the function to execute.
Notice that when ``operator()`` is called, it in turn calls the method provided
with the object pointer using the C++ PMI syntax.
To use this, one could then declare some model code that takes a generic functor
as a parameter::
void LibraryFunction (Functor functor);
The code that will talk to the model would build a specific functor and pass it to ``LibraryFunction``::
MyClass myClass;
SpecificFunctor<MyClass, int> functor (&myclass, MyClass::MyMethod);
When ``LibraryFunction`` is done, it executes the callback using the
``operator()`` on the generic functor it was passed, and in this particular
case, provides the integer argument::
void
LibraryFunction (Functor functor)
{
// Execute the library function
functor(1234);
}
Notice that ``LibraryFunction`` is completely decoupled from the specific
type of the client. The connection is made through the Functor polymorphism.
The Callback API in |ns3| implements object-oriented callbacks using
the functor mechanism. This callback API, being based on C++ templates, is
type-safe; that is, it performs static type checks to enforce proper signature
compatibility between callers and callees. It is therefore more type-safe to
use than traditional function pointers, but the syntax may look imposing at
first. This section is designed to walk you through the Callback system so
that you can be comfortable using it in |ns3|.
Using the Callback API
**********************
The Callback API is fairly minimal, providing only two services:
1. callback type declaration: a way to declare a type of callback
with a given signature, and,
2. callback instantiation: a way to instantiate a
template-generated forwarding callback which can forward any calls
to another C++ class member method or C++ function.
This is best observed via walking through an example, based on
``samples/main-callback.cc``.
Using the Callback API with static functions
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Consider a function::
static double
CbOne (double a, double b)
{
std::cout << "invoke cbOne a=" << a << ", b=" << b << std::endl;
return a;
}
Consider also the following main program snippet::
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
// return type: double
// first arg type: double
// second arg type: double
Callback<double, double, double> one;
}
This is an example of a C-style callback -- one which does not include or need
a ``this`` pointer. The function template ``Callback`` is essentially the
declaration of the variable containing the pointer-to-function. In the example
above, we explicitly showed a pointer to a function that returned an integer and
took a single integer as a parameter, The ``Callback`` template function is
a generic version of that -- it is used to declare the type of a callback.
.. note:: Readers unfamiliar with C++ templates may consult `<http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/templates/>`_.
The ``Callback`` template requires one mandatory argument (the return type
of the function to be assigned to this callback) and up to five optional
arguments, which each specify the type of the arguments (if your particular
callback function has more than five arguments, then this can be handled
by extending the callback implementation).
So in the above example, we have a declared a callback named "one" that will
eventually hold a function pointer. The signature of the function that it will
hold must return double and must support two double arguments. If one tries
to pass a function whose signature does not match the declared callback,
a compilation error will occur. Also, if one tries to assign to a callback
an incompatible one, compilation will succeed but a run-time
NS_FATAL_ERROR will be raised. The sample program
``src/core/examples/main-callback.cc`` demonstrates both of these error cases
at the end of the ``main()`` program.
Now, we need to tie together this callback instance and the actual target function
(CbOne). Notice above that CbOne has the same function signature types as the
callback-- this is important. We can pass in any such properly-typed function
to this callback. Let's look at this more closely::
static double CbOne (double a, double b) {}
^ ^ ^
| ---| ------|
| | |
Callback<double, double, double> one;
You can only bind a function to a callback if they have the matching signature.
The first template argument is the return type, and the additional template
arguments are the types of the arguments of the function signature.
Now, let's bind our callback "one" to the function that matches its signature::
// build callback instance which points to cbOne function
one = MakeCallback (&CbOne);
This call to ``MakeCallback`` is, in essence, creating one of the specialized
functors mentioned above. The variable declared using the ``Callback``
template function is going to be playing the part of the generic functor. The
assignment ``one = MakeCallback (&CbOne)`` is the cast that converts the
specialized functor known to the callee to a generic functor known to the caller.
Then, later in the program, if the callback is needed, it can be used as follows::
NS_ASSERT (!one.IsNull ());
// invoke cbOne function through callback instance
double retOne;
retOne = one (10.0, 20.0);
The check for ``IsNull()`` ensures that the callback is not null -- that there
is a function to call behind this callback. Then, ``one()`` executes the
generic ``operator()`` which is really overloaded with a specific implementation
of ``operator()`` and returns the same result as if ``CbOne()`` had been
called directly.
Using the Callback API with member functions
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Generally, you will not be calling static functions but instead public member
functions of an object. In this case, an extra argument is needed to the
MakeCallback function, to tell the system on which object the function should be
invoked. Consider this example, also from main-callback.cc::
class MyCb {
public:
int CbTwo (double a) {
std::cout << "invoke cbTwo a=" << a << std::endl;
return -5;
}
};
int main ()
{
...
// return type: int
// first arg type: double
Callback<int, double> two;
MyCb cb;
// build callback instance which points to MyCb::cbTwo
two = MakeCallback (&MyCb::CbTwo, &cb);
...
}
Here, we pass an additional object pointer to the ``MakeCallback<>`` function.
Recall from the background section above that ``Operator()`` will use the pointer to
member syntax when it executes on an object::
virtual int operator() (ARG arg)
{
(*m_p.*m_pmi)(arg);
}
And so we needed to provide the two variables (``m_p`` and ``m_pmi``) when
we made the specific functor. The line::
two = MakeCallback (&MyCb::CbTwo, &cb);
does precisely that. In this case, when ``two ()`` is invoked::
int result = two (1.0);
will result in a call tothe ``CbTwo`` member function (method) on the object
pointed to by ``&cb``.
Building Null Callbacks
+++++++++++++++++++++++
It is possible for callbacks to be null; hence it may be wise to
check before using them. There is a special construct for a null
callback, which is preferable to simply passing "0" as an argument;
it is the ``MakeNullCallback<>`` construct::
two = MakeNullCallback<int, double> ();
NS_ASSERT (two.IsNull ());
Invoking a null callback is just like invoking a null function pointer: it will
crash at runtime.
Bound Callbacks
***************
A very useful extension to the functor concept is that of a Bound Callback.
Previously it was mentioned that closures were originally function calls
packaged up for later execution. Notice that in all of the Callback
descriptions above, there is no way to package up any parameters for use
later -- when the ``Callback`` is called via ``operator()``. All of
the parameters are provided by the calling function.
What if it is desired to allow the client function (the one that provides the
callback) to provide some of the parameters? `Alexandrescu <http://erdani.com/book/main.html>`_ calls the process of
allowing a client to specify one of the parameters *"binding"*. One of the
parameters of ``operator()`` has been bound (fixed) by the client.
Some of our pcap tracing code provides a nice example of this. There is a
function that needs to be called whenever a packet is received. This function
calls an object that actually writes the packet to disk in the pcap file
format. The signature of one of these functions will be::
static void DefaultSink (Ptr<PcapFileWrapper> file, Ptr<const Packet> p);
The static keyword means this is a static function which does not need a
``this`` pointer, so it will be using C-style callbacks. We don't want the
calling code to have to know about anything but the Packet. What we want in
the calling code is just a call that looks like::
m_promiscSnifferTrace (m_currentPkt);
What we want to do is to *bind* the ``Ptr<PcapFileWriter> file`` to the
specific callback implementation when it is created and arrange for the
``operator()`` of the Callback to provide that parameter for free.
We provide the ``MakeBoundCallback`` template function for that purpose. It
takes the same parameters as the ``MakeCallback`` template function but also
takes the parameters to be bound. In the case of the example above::
MakeBoundCallback (&DefaultSink, file);
will create a specific callback implementation that knows to add in the extra
bound arguments. Conceptually, it extends the specific functor described above
with one or more bound arguments::
template <typename T, typename ARG, typename BOUND_ARG>
class SpecificFunctor : public Functor
{
public:
SpecificFunctor(T* p, int (T::*_pmi)(ARG arg), BOUND_ARG boundArg)
{
m_p = p;
m_pmi = pmi;
m_boundArg = boundArg;
}
virtual int operator() (ARG arg)
{
(*m_p.*m_pmi)(m_boundArg, arg);
}
private:
void (T::*m_pmi)(ARG arg);
T* m_p;
BOUND_ARG m_boundArg;
};
You can see that when the specific functor is created, the bound argument is saved
in the functor / callback object itself. When the ``operator()`` is invoked with
the single parameter, as in::
m_promiscSnifferTrace (m_currentPkt);
the implementation of ``operator()`` adds the bound parameter into the actual
function call::
(*m_p.*m_pmi)(m_boundArg, arg);
Traced Callbacks
****************
*Placeholder subsection*
Callback locations in ns-3
**************************
Where are callbacks frequently used in |ns3|? Here are some of the
more visible ones to typical users:
* Socket API
* Layer-2/Layer-3 API
* Tracing subsystem
* API between IP and routing subsystems
Implementation details
**********************
The code snippets above are simplistic and only designed to illustrate the mechanism
itself. The actual Callback code is quite complicated and very template-intense and
a deep understanding of the code is not required. If interested, expert users may
find the following useful.
The code was originally written based on the techniques described in
`<http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/TTLFunction.asp>`_.
It was subsequently rewritten to follow the architecture outlined in
`Modern C++ Design, Generic Programming and Design Patterns Applied, Alexandrescu, chapter 5, Generalized Functors <http://www.moderncppdesign.com/book/main.html>`_.
This code uses:
* default template parameters to saves users from having to
specify empty parameters when the number of parameters
is smaller than the maximum supported number
* the pimpl idiom: the Callback class is passed around by
value and delegates the crux of the work to its pimpl pointer.
* two pimpl implementations which derive from CallbackImpl
FunctorCallbackImpl can be used with any functor-type
while MemPtrCallbackImpl can be used with pointers to
member functions.
* a reference list implementation to implement the Callback's
value semantics.
This code most notably departs from the Alexandrescu implementation in that it
does not use type lists to specify and pass around the types of the callback
arguments. Of course, it also does not use copy-destruction semantics and
relies on a reference list rather than autoPtr to hold the pointer.