update tutorial second.cc program output
This commit is contained in:
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ You should see the contents of the pcap file displayed:
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-0-0.pcap, link-type PPP (PPP)
|
||||
2.000000 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.007602 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.017607 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
The first line of the dump indicates that the link type is PPP (point-to-point)
|
||||
which we expect. You then see the echo packet leaving node zero via the
|
||||
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ link:
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-1-0.pcap, link-type PPP (PPP)
|
||||
2.003686 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.003915 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.013921 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
Here we see that the link type is also PPP as we would expect. You see the
|
||||
packet from IP address 10.1.1.1 (that was sent at 2.000000 seconds) headed
|
||||
@@ -453,12 +453,12 @@ You should now see the promiscuous dump of node two, device zero:
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-2-0.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
|
||||
2.003696 arp who-has 10.1.2.4 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1
|
||||
2.003707 arp reply 10.1.2.4 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:06
|
||||
2.003801 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.003811 arp who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.4
|
||||
2.003822 arp reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03
|
||||
2.003915 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.007698 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.4 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1, length 50
|
||||
2.007710 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.4 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:06, length 50
|
||||
2.007803 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.013815 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.4, length 50
|
||||
2.013828 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03, length 50
|
||||
2.013921 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see, the link type is now "Ethernet". Something new has appeared,
|
||||
though. The bus network needs ``ARP``, the Address Resolution Protocol.
|
||||
@@ -473,15 +473,15 @@ This exchange is seen in the following lines,
|
||||
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
2.003696 arp who-has 10.1.2.4 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1
|
||||
2.003707 arp reply 10.1.2.4 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:06
|
||||
2.007698 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.4 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1, length 50
|
||||
2.007710 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.4 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:06, length 50
|
||||
|
||||
Then node one, device one goes ahead and sends the echo packet to the UDP echo
|
||||
server at IP address 10.1.2.4.
|
||||
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
2.003801 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.007803 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
The server receives the echo request and turns the packet around trying to send
|
||||
it back to the source. The server knows that this address is on another network
|
||||
@@ -492,14 +492,14 @@ just like the first CSMA node had to do.
|
||||
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
2.003811 arp who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.4
|
||||
2.003822 arp reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03
|
||||
2.013815 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.4, length 50
|
||||
2.013828 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03, length 50
|
||||
|
||||
The server then sends the echo back to the forwarding node.
|
||||
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
2.003915 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.013921 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
Looking back at the rightmost node of the point-to-point link,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ the last line of the trace dump.
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-1-0.pcap, link-type PPP (PPP)
|
||||
2.003686 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.003915 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.013921 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
Lastly, you can look back at the node that originated the echo
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ and see that the echoed packet arrives back at the source at 2.007602 seconds,
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-0-0.pcap, link-type PPP (PPP)
|
||||
2.000000 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.4.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.007602 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.017607 IP 10.1.2.4.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, recall that we added the ability to control the number of CSMA devices
|
||||
in the simulation by command line argument. You can change this argument in
|
||||
@@ -547,9 +547,10 @@ You should now see,
|
||||
Waf: Entering directory `/home/craigdo/repos/ns-3-allinone/ns-3-dev/build'
|
||||
Waf: Leaving directory `/home/craigdo/repos/ns-3-allinone/ns-3-dev/build'
|
||||
'build' finished successfully (0.405s)
|
||||
Sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.2.5
|
||||
Received 1024 bytes from 10.1.1.1
|
||||
Received 1024 bytes from 10.1.2.5
|
||||
At time 2s client sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.2.5 port 9
|
||||
At time 2.0118s server received 1024 bytes from 10.1.1.1 port 49153
|
||||
At time 2.0118s server sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.1.1 port 49153
|
||||
At time 2.02461s client received 1024 bytes from 10.1.2.5 port 9
|
||||
|
||||
Notice that the echo server has now been relocated to the last of the CSMA
|
||||
nodes, which is 10.1.2.5 instead of the default case, 10.1.2.4.
|
||||
@@ -621,9 +622,10 @@ you will see the following output:
|
||||
Waf: Entering directory `/home/craigdo/repos/ns-3-allinone/ns-3-dev/build'
|
||||
Waf: Leaving directory `/home/craigdo/repos/ns-3-allinone/ns-3-dev/build'
|
||||
'build' finished successfully (0.407s)
|
||||
Sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.2.101
|
||||
Received 1024 bytes from 10.1.1.1
|
||||
Received 1024 bytes from 10.1.2.101
|
||||
At time 2s client sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.2.101 port 9
|
||||
At time 2.0068s server received 1024 bytes from 10.1.1.1 port 49153
|
||||
At time 2.0068s server sent 1024 bytes to 10.1.1.1 port 49153
|
||||
At time 2.01761s client received 1024 bytes from 10.1.2.101 port 9
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the echo server is now located at 10.1.2.101 which corresponds to
|
||||
having 100 "extra" CSMA nodes with the echo server on the last one. If you
|
||||
@@ -655,8 +657,8 @@ entire CSMA network.
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-100-0.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
|
||||
2.003696 arp who-has 10.1.2.101 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1
|
||||
2.003811 arp who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.101
|
||||
2.006698 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.101 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1, length 50
|
||||
2.013815 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.101, length 50
|
||||
|
||||
Now take a look at the ``tcpdump`` for ``second-101-0.pcap``.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -669,12 +671,12 @@ You can now see that node 101 is really the participant in the echo exchange.
|
||||
.. sourcecode:: text
|
||||
|
||||
reading from file second-101-0.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
|
||||
2.003696 arp who-has 10.1.2.101 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1
|
||||
2.003696 arp reply 10.1.2.101 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:67
|
||||
2.003801 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.101.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.003801 arp who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.101
|
||||
2.003822 arp reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03
|
||||
2.003822 IP 10.1.2.101.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.006698 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.101 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.1, length 50
|
||||
2.006698 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.101 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:67, length 50
|
||||
2.006803 IP 10.1.1.1.49153 > 10.1.2.101.9: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
2.013803 ARP, Request who-has 10.1.2.1 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 10.1.2.101, length 50
|
||||
2.013828 ARP, Reply 10.1.2.1 is-at 00:00:00:00:00:03, length 50
|
||||
2.013828 IP 10.1.2.101.9 > 10.1.1.1.49153: UDP, length 1024
|
||||
|
||||
Models, Attributes and Reality
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user